Blog · IT Benchmarking

IT Benchmarking in 2026: A Strategic Approach to Building Competitive Technology Teams (Part 2)

Cordus continues its IT benchmarking series: why skills now matter more than job titles, how AI is changing what benchmarking should measure, and how to turn benchmarking data into better HR decisions.

October 22, 20263 min readIT Benchmarking

We are going to continue our tour throughout IT benchmarking in 2026 and its peculiarities. Cordus has already prepared new insights to take into consideration.

One of the most important changes in IT benchmarking is the need to look beyond job titles and examine skills. Technology skills can change in market value much faster than traditional job classifications.

For example, organizations may need to evaluate their capabilities in areas such as:

  • Artificial intelligence and machine learning
  • Cybersecurity
  • Cloud architecture
  • Data engineering
  • DevOps and platform engineering
  • Software development
  • Data analytics
  • IT architecture
  • Automation
  • AI governance and security

Specialist skills can create significant differences in the talent market even when two positions have similar titles. Current 2026 research continues to show particularly strong demand for specialized technology capabilities, including AI, cybersecurity, cloud, data, and related areas.

For IT leaders, this creates an important benchmarking question:

Do we have the skills our business strategy requires — and are we positioned competitively enough to attract and retain them?

Benchmarking in the Age of AI

Software developers may increasingly work with AI-assisted development tools. Cybersecurity teams may use AI for monitoring and analysis. IT operations teams may introduce AI-enabled automation. Data professionals may spend more time managing AI-ready data infrastructure and governance.

AI is changing the capabilities IT roles need to deliver.
AI is changing the capabilities IT roles need to deliver.

The Linux Foundation's 2026 State of Tech Talent research describes the current environment as a skills crisis rather than simply a jobs crisis, with organizations reporting capability gaps in areas including AI security and AI operations. The research also highlights upskilling existing employees as a major response to talent gaps.

This means IT benchmarking should not only ask: "What should we pay for this role?" It should also ask: "What capabilities will this role need to deliver over the next two to three years?" That shift can help organizations avoid building compensation and job structures around skills that are becoming less relevant while failing to invest in emerging capabilities.

From Benchmarking Data to Better HR Decisions

Benchmarking itself does not create change. The real value comes from translating market information into practical HR and organizational decisions:

  1. 01

    If benchmarking identifies inconsistencies between similar IT roles:

    The organization can review job architecture, career levels, grading, and internal equity.

  2. 02

    If specialized roles are consistently difficult to recruit:

    Recruitment strategies can be redesigned, including sourcing channels, geographic reach, hiring processes, and compensation.

  3. 03

    If competitors offer stronger benefits:

    The organization can reassess its employee value proposition.

  4. 04

    If IT turnover is increasing:

    Leadership can investigate compensation, career progression, workload, management, flexibility, and development opportunities rather than assuming salary is the only problem.

  5. 05

    If critical skills are difficult to hire externally:

    The organization can consider reskilling and upskilling existing employees.

This last point is particularly relevant in 2026. The Linux Foundation reports that organizations are significantly more likely to prioritize upskilling than external hiring across strategic technology domains, reflecting the value of existing institutional knowledge and team cohesion.

Benchmarking findings only matter once they shape real workforce decisions.
Benchmarking findings only matter once they shape real workforce decisions.

Conclusion: Benchmarking Is About More Than a Number

All of these factors contribute to a meaningful picture of an organization's position in the IT talent market. But benchmarking is only the starting point. The real advantage comes when organizations use the findings to redesign compensation, improve job architecture, strengthen recruitment, develop internal talent, improve the employee experience, and align their IT workforce with future business requirements.

Benchmarking tells you where you are. Strategic HR and workforce planning help determine where you go next.

In a technology market defined by continuous change, that distinction can make benchmarking one of the most valuable tools for building competitive, resilient, and future-ready IT teams.

Key takeaways

  • Skills now change in market value faster than job titles — benchmark capabilities, not just positions.
  • In the age of AI, ask what a role will need to deliver over the next two to three years, not only what to pay for it.
  • Benchmarking creates value only when it drives decisions on job architecture, recruitment, benefits, retention and development.
  • Upskilling existing employees is increasingly prioritized over external hiring for critical technology skills.
Back to blog

Want this kind of thinking on your project?

Start a project